This page documents an English Wikipedia style guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense and the occasional exception. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.

Style and formatting
Manual of Style and its subpages
Abbreviations Accessibility Anime & manga articles Biographies Capital letters Chemistry Command-line examples Dates and numbers Disambiguation pages Icons (i.e. flags, awards) Infoboxes Legal Links Lists of works Mathematics Medicine Military history guidelines Music Pronunciation Spelling Text formatting Titles Trademarks Writing about fiction
Related policies and guidelines
Captions Categorization Categorization of people Citing sources Explain jargon External links Film guidelines Footnotes Layout Lead section Lists Music samples Naming conventions Overlinking Proper names Stubs Summary style Technical terms Trivia sections Writing better articles Wikimedia sister projects Words to avoid
Related help, tutorials and proposals
Glossary How to edit a page Picture tutorial Sections
Related to specific cultures
Arabic-related articles Chinese language Chinese history Ethiopia-related articles France & French-related Hebrew transliteration India-related articles Ireland-related articles Islam-related articles Japan-related articles Korea-related articles Latter Day Saints Philippines-related articles Portugal-related articles Singapore-related articles Thailand-related articles Syriac/Assyrian-related articles United Kingdom nationalities U.S. highways

When writing technical articles, it is usually the case that a number of technical terms or jargon specific to the subject matter will be presented. These should be defined or at least alternative language provided, so that a non-technical reader can both learn the terms and understand how they are used by scientists. It is also the case that such an article can cover a range of related subjects that might not each justify a separate article or Wikipedia page, and therefore making technical terms stand out in the text is the first level in a sequence from definition to subtitle to separate article. On the other hand, do not treat every “scientific” word as a technical term. Ask the question: Is this the only article or one of a very few where the term might be encountered in Wikipedia? Consider the examples presented below.

There are three basic markups used to make technical terms stand out; these are italic (also termed oblique with sans-serif fonts), bold, and bold italic. The following uses of these styles are recommended for technical articles:

Italic (edited as ''italic'') is used for:

• Words, other than loan words, of foreign languages: hidari (Jp: "left"); but not "gauche" (Fr: "left"), an established loan word in English.
• Binomial names of organisms (Genus species), which are considered Latin, even if newly coined. (The initial letter of a genus is always capitalized, but never that of a species.) Higher taxonomic levels are not italicized. When both the classification term and its name form a unified title, they are both first-letter capitalized: "Family Poaceae"; when they do not form a title, only the name is capitalized: "the family Poaceae".
• Technical or scientific terms that are defined above in the same article (and appear there in bold italic; see below) to demonstrate use of the term, or emphasize that use to the reader. Although it is standard practice in text books to put in italics or bold font those words likely to be new to the reader only the first time the word appears, it is helpful to the learning process if newly defined terms that reappear are rendered in italic font elsewhere in a Wikipedia article.
• Terms that are not defined at that point in the text, but are nonetheless "technical", although will likely appear in numerous other articles in Wikipedia. Here, the "emphasize only the first time used on a page" rule could apply. Example (from Plant):

Groups at this level of organization, collectively called bryophytes, include….

• Words as words: Deuce means two. See also: Wikipedia:Manual of Style, subsections Caption style and Style for words as words and Wikipedia:Cite your sources for other uses of italicised or oblique text.

Bold (edited as '''bold'''); used for:

• First use of the article name, near the front of the introduction sentence.
• Definitions that are important aspects discussed by the article, but have not been elevated to the level of subtitle and do not pass the "rare technical term" test. Example (from Current (electricity)):

In electricity, current is any flow of charge, usually through a metal wire or some other electrical conductor. Conventional current was defined early in the history of electrical science as a flow of positive charge, although we now know that, in the case of metallic conduction...

Bold italic (edited as '''''bold italic'''''); used for:

• First time introduction of a technical term if the term is immediately followed by a non-technical substitute in parentheses. Example (from Fern):

A fern is defined as a vascular plant that reproduces by shedding spores to initiate an alternation of generations. New fronds arise by circinate vernation (unrolling leaf formation).

As in the fern example above, any of the three styles described above could be turned into a link if there exists a more detailed or better explanation of the technical term in a separate article. It may not be necessary then to define the term in the article if a link leads to a definition. However, to aid the reader in continuing with the text without having to leave an article for other details, it might still be appropriate to include a non-technical substitute in parentheses, as in the fern example above.

When a vast amount of jargon appears in an article, you might consider bundling all terms and their definitions within a list. When you do so, do use the appropriate definition list markup: Instead of

*'''term''': definition

use

; term : definition

Some other markups are available but risky. Examples are teletype (edited as <tt>teletype</tt>), underline (edited as <u>underline</u>), and italic (edited as <i>italic</i> or <cite>italic</cite>). But the teletype (monospace) tag does not usually produce text sufficiently different from the standard Wikipedia font to be useful; the underline tag can create confusion with links; and the HTML tags <i> and <cite> are not differentiated by most common browsers. The Wikipedia italic, described above and edited as ''italic'', is preferable to the HTML tags <i> and <cite>.

The markup "double-quoted" (edited as "double-quoted") is not risky, but see the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, subsection Punctuation for use of quotation marks.

See also

• Wikipedia:Explain jargon
• Wikipedia:Federal Standard 1037C terms
• Wikipedia:Make technical articles accessible