|
Wikipedia:Requested moves
|
Administrator instructions
 |
This page has a backlog that requires the attention of one or more administrators.
Please remove this notice when the backlog is cleared. |
Requested moves is a place for requesting the retitling of an article, a template, or a page in the Wikipedia namespace. Any logged-in user who has been registered for more than four days and has made at least ten edits can use the [move] tab located at the top of each page to perform simple moves (see Help:Moving a page). However, administrator help is required if the desired title is already occupied by a redirect with a page history of more than one edit (most common), if the redirect target has a single edit but is pointing to a different page than the article sought to be moved, if the desired title matches an entry on the title blacklist, or if the page is fully protected.
In some situations, the value of a move may be under dispute, and discussion is necessary in order to reach a consensus. There is no obligation to list such move requests here; discussions of page moves can always be carried out at the article's talk page without adding an entry. This page may be seen as a place to advertise move debates that would benefit from wider community input, or for users to request assistance from administrators in moving pages.
Most move requests are processed by a handful of regular contributors who are familiar with naming conventions, nonbinding precedents, and page moving procedures. Requests are generally processed after five days, although backlogs of a few days develop occasionally. If there is a clear consensus after this time, the request will be closed and acted upon. If not, the administrator may choose to re-list the request to allow time for consensus to develop, or close it as "no consensus".
Processes beyond the scope of this page
Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:
To rename an image, upload the image again, but with the name you want. Then change the relevant links to reflect the new name and list the old image at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion.
To rename a category, propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
To rename a stub template, propose the move at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion.
To merge two articles, make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers or be bold and do it yourself.
To request that page histories be merged, list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen.
Requesting uncontroversial moves
If the move you are suggesting is uncontroversial and technically possible, please feel free to move the page yourself. Moves are possible (for registered users with accounts over four days old) when the desired name is a red link, or in cases where the target is a simple redirect—a redirect to the current title, with no prior versions in its edit history. After moving a page, update its text to reflect the new title.
If there has been any past debate about the best title for the page, or if the page has recently been moved in good faith, or if anyone could honestly disagree with the move, then treat it as controversial. Otherwise, post your request in the Uncontroversial proposals section of this page.
If the only obstacle to an uncontroversial move is a navigation aid (e.g. a redirect or an unnecessary disambiguation page with a minor edit history), the template {{db-move}} can be used instead to have that page deleted under criterion for speedy deletion G6.
Requesting potentially controversial moves
Please follow all three steps listed below when requesting a move.
- Step 1 — Add move template to talk page
- Enter {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article, or add {{moveoptions}} if you are unsure of the best title for the article.
- Step 2 — Create a place for discussion
- If the discussion does not already exist, create a section at the bottom of the talk page of the page you have requested to be moved. This can take any form that is reasonable for administrators to follow, although it is convenient to use the heading
==Requested move==, because this is assumed by the templates in steps 1 and 3. The template {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} can be used to create a framework for a poll, but be aware that polling can be divisive.
- Once the requested move process is at an end, the only record of the requested move is kept on the talk page of the article. The current page name and the suggested new name must be placed at the top of the section where the move is discussed so that editors who read the talk page in the future can see clearly what the proposed move was.
- Step 3 — Add the request to the "Other proposals" list on this page
- Add {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} at the top of the section under the date line, replacing PageName, NewName and reason for move with the existing title, the new name for the article and the reason for moving it. The template will include all the necessary formatting, including your signature.
- Alternatively, if the new name for the article is unclear, add {{subst:RMlink?|PageName|reason for move}} at the top of the section under the date line, replacing PageName with the existing title and reason for move with the reason for moving it. The template will include all the necessary formatting, including your signature.
Moving several pages at once
An example of how to request to move a block of pages:
*([[Talk:Page A|Discuss]]) -- Rationale goes here. --~~~~
**[[Page A]] → [[Page D]]
**[[Page B]] → [[Page E]]
**[[Page C]] → [[Page F]]
On Talk:Page A, follow steps 1 and 2 above (add {{move|Page D}} to the top and create a section for discussion).
On Talk:Page B, add {{multimove|Page E|Talk:Page A}} to the top.
On Talk:Page C, add {{multimove|Page F|Talk:Page A}} to the top.
Uncontroversial proposals
Only list proposals here that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete (for example, spelling and capitalization fixes). Do not list a proposed page move in this section if there is any possibility that it could be opposed by anyone. Please list new requests at the bottom of the list in this section and use {{subst:RMassist|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} rather than copying previous entries. The template will automatically include your signature. No edits to the article's talk page are required. If you object to a proposal listed here, please re-list it in the #Incomplete and contested proposals section below.
Incomplete and contested proposals
With the exception of a brief description of the problem or objection to the move proposal, please do not discuss move proposals here. If you support an incomplete or contested move proposal, please consider following the instructions above to complete the proposal, and move it to the "Other Proposals" section below, normally under the earliest date on which all instructions have been completed. Proposals that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.
- Contested - Since the article is entirely unreferenced, it's hard to say in this case, but standard English does not require an apostrophe. --DAJF (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- http://images.google.nl/images?hl=nl&q=ultramagnetic+mc%27s&gbv=2 --Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 11:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- B.O.M.B. (album) → Back on My B.S. —(Discuss)— There are no sources stating the album to be B.O.M.B. (the abbrev) of this so called upcoming album. The source linked is broken. His website has the full name (Back on My B.S.) as the name of his upcoming new album. I was also recently at a Busta Rhymes performance and he stated the album to be Back on my B.S. and not B.O.M.B.. --Douglasr007 (talk) 07:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Incomplete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- I oppose..BRITANNICA ENCYCLOPEDIA USES KANARA not CANARA , see Britannica, one more reference here [1]...it is very clear KANARA is more appropriate.
Kanara is officially recognised name,one more reference from Indian government site Kanara
I Request admins to not move page, because i given valid proofs to show Kanara is a correct word 59.92.183.179 (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Other proposals
 |
Please use the correct template; see the instructions above.
Do not attempt to copy and paste formatting from another listing. |
Purge the cache to refresh this page
- Harris → Harris (Isle of) —(Discuss)— The Isle of Harris is no more deserving of the being the primary use of Harris than some of the other places, people and things that bear it as their name. Harris, Michigan is of similar size so why is the Isle of Harris being promoted above these other uses of the name? This is a COI issue. In terms of Wikipedia content the Harris (surname) use has by far the most information of any use of Harris (note that there is so much that it has had to be subdivided into pages hanging below the Harris (surname) page, e.g., List of people with surname Harris, Herries, etc. Also outside of the immediate area of the Isle of Harris it is most commonly known by people as "the Isle of Harris". By wikipedia's guidelines the title of its page should also reflect how it most commonly referred to, i.e. "Isle of Harris" or "Harris (Isle of)". I would tend to say that Harris (surname) should be primary topic but in view of the multiple uses of the word think it most pragmatic to set Harris to go to the disambig page as a compromise, as per wiki rules on controversial names with multiple uses. --WickerWiki (talk) 11:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Goodwin Rosen → Goody Rosen —(Discuss)— More commonly used name and name used professionally for this baseball player. "To" page is currently a redirect to the existing page that has been edited. --Dewelar (talk) 02:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- (Discuss) — This was a surprisingly contentious issue at WP:CAPS a while ago, and I feel obliged to put this issue to rest. This concerns the capitalization of "like" when being used as a preposition. Since the "like" in proper nouns such as "Freak L(l)ike Me" is being used as a preposition, it technically shouldn't be capitalized. However, almost all media sources capitalize "like," so there's little point in following some Wikipedia guideline if it doesn't make logical sense. — Xnux the Echidna 01:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- November 11, 2008 incident off Somalia → ? —(Discuss)— During the discussion that was raised over whether this article should be deleted-[2], a number of people posted the idea that the name of the article should be changed, with one person stating "The article name does not clearly identify the subject", and another saying "I suggest the title should include "naval", "Somalia" and "piracy" or "pirates", as these are the likeliest search terms". I agree that the title should be changed, so as to make the article easier to find for those who are looking for information on the engagement is covers. I don't know what to change the title to, though, and the engagement has not been referred to by any name that I can find in reliable sources. —BlueVine (talk) 16:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- QSO B1939+605 → 3C 401 —(Discuss)— most common name used in google scholar, additional, this isn't a quasar, so shouldn't be named using the quasar naming method --76.66.195.63 (talk) 08:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- QSO B2153+377 → 3C 438 —(Discuss)— most common name used in google scholar, additional, this isn't a quasar, so shouldn't be named using the quasar naming method --76.66.195.63 (talk) 08:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- QSO B0410+110 → 3C 109 —(Discuss)— most common name used in google scholar, additional, this isn't a quasar, so shouldn't be named using the quasar naming method --76.66.195.63 (talk) 07:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Vive le Québec libre speech → Vive le Québec libre —(Discuss)— The combination of French and English does not read well. Is there any other possible understanding of "Vive le Québec libre" in an English encyclopaedia than as a reference to de Gaulle's speech? It is already a redirect. --Srnec (talk) 06:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Heavy metal music → Heavy metal —(Discuss)— Given that heavy metal redirects to heavy metal music and that the genre is almost universally referred to as heavy metal (even the article begins with "Heavy metal" and goes on to refer to the genre as "heavy metal" dozens of times as opposed to only three uses of "heavy metal music"), the article should be moved to "Heavy metal." --Marcus Brute (talk) 01:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Portal:Technology and applied sciences → Portal:Technology -(Discuss) - Officially listed as "technology" from the main page link. Applied Science is a broad topic covered mostly by Portal:Science. The Portal's sub pages are all listed under Portal:Technology/ rather than Portal:Technology and applied sciences/. Moving the portal would make the job of improving it a hell of a lot easier under technology/ --Flewis(talk) 08:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Bishops Hull → Bishop's Hull —(Discuss)— village name includes the apostrophe but new name is currently a redirect to existing article - see discussion on talk --20:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)— Rod talk
- Weymouth, Dorset → Weymouth —(Discuss)— Weymouth (disambiguation) was recently moved to Weymouth without any prior consensus or discussion as far as I can tell. Weymouth is a featured article, but since it has been moved to Weymouth, Dorset, the articles linked to it now point to the dab page. --BarretBonden (talk) 13:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Attorney General → Attorney general —(Discuss)— The article in question is a glorified disambiguation page that links to specific AG articles for various countries and US states. It was moved from the proper lowercase from to uppercase based on the faulty logic that it attorney general is an office of state. While there is some room for debate on when to capitalize the office when writing about a specific jurisdiction's attorney general, there can be no debate that the term should be lowercased when used generically to refer to attorneys general without reference to any specific place. --Rrius (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Backlog
Move dated sections here after five days have passed (November 17 or older).
- (Discuss) — The naming convention at WP:NC-SHIPS for ships in navies that do not use prefixes is [Country] [Type of ship] [Name of ship] ([Pennant number (if any)]). These changes will bring these Russian/Soviet submarines in line with the existing naming conventions. This proposal is a result of a discussion at WikiProject Ships. — Bellhalla (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- {{Discuss}} — Despite there being consensus on the discussion page and the articles subsequently moved by an administrator, User:Huaiwei has moved these articles back again. - oahiyeel talk 13:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Security belt of Nagorno-Karabakh Republic → ? —(Discuss)— The title is not neutral. The 7 districts of Azerbaijan, which are under control of armed Armenian forces, are generally referred to as occupied territories of Azerbaijan. 4 UN Security Council Resolutions [3] and resolutions of PACE [4] and other international organizations, as well as mass media use the term Occupied territories. But some may see the word "occupied" as non-neutral, and therefore something like Political status of 7 Armenian controlled districts of Azerbaijan or Political status of 7 districts of Azerbaijan, which are under Armenian control might be more acceptable. I see that this is what other similar articles are called, see for example Political status of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Any suggestions of other acceptable titles are welcome. —Grandmaster (talk) 12:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)