Grandfather clause 

A grandfather clause is a term used in U.S. English for an exception that allows an old rule to continue to apply to some existing situations, when a new rule will apply to all future situations. It is often used as a verb: to grandfather means to grant such an exemption. For example, a "grandfathered power plant" might be exempt from new, more restrictive pollution laws. Often, such a provision is used as a compromise, to effect new rules without upsetting a well-established logistical or political situation. This extends the idea of a rule not being retroactively applied. It is a portion of a statute that provides that the law is not applicable in certain circumstances due to preexisting facts.

The term originated in clauses in late 19th century legislation and constitutional amendments passed by Southern states' creating new restrictions on voter registration in an attempt to limit the franchise. It allowed men to vote, even if they did not meet new requirements, based on their having ancestors who had the right to vote before the Civil War - effectively limiting the exemption to white men.

Contents

Origin

The original grandfather clauses were contained in new state constitutions and Jim Crow laws passed from 1890 to 1910 in many of the Southern United States to prevent blacks, Mexican Americans (in Texas), and certain whites from voting.1 Prohibitions on freedmen's voting in place prior to 1870 were nullified by the Fifteenth Amendment.

After conservative white Democrats took control of state legislatures again in the late 1870s, they began to work to restrict the ability of blacks to vote. Paramilitary groups had intimidated blacks or barred them from the polls in numerous elections prior to this Redemption. The coalition of Populists and Republicans in fusion tickets in the 1890s threatened Democratic control and increased the Democrats' desire to restrict blacks from voting. Conservative whites developed statutes and passed new constitutions creating restrictive voter registration rules. Examples included imposition of poll taxes, residency and literacy tests. An exemption to such requirements was made for all persons allowed to vote before the American Civil War, and any of their descendants. The term "grandfather clause" arose from the fact that the laws tied the then-current generation's voting rights to those of their grandfathers. According to Black's Law Dictionary, some southern states adopted constitutional provisions exempting from the literacy requirements descendants of those who fought in the army or navy of the United States or of the Confederate States during a time of war.

After the U.S. Supreme Court found such provisions unconstitutional in Guinn v. United States (1915), states had to stop using the grandfather clause to provide exemption to literacy tests. Determined to limit the franchise, however, southern states created new barriers to voter registration, such as subjective literacy or comprehension tests, administered by white voter registrars.

Without the grandfather clauses, strict application of poll taxes and/or literacy tests would have disfranchised many more poor whites as well. In fact, tens of thousands of poor whites were disfranchised in the early 20th century in the South, and most blacks in the South were disfranchised until the 1960s.2

As decades passed, southern states tended to expand the franchise for poor whites but most blacks could not vote until after passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Ratification in 1964 of the Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibited the use of poll taxes in federal elections, but some states continued to use them in state elections.

The 1965 Voting Rights Act had provisions to protect voter registration and access to elections, with federal enforcement and supervision where necessary. In 1966, the Supreme Court ruled in Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections that poll taxes could not be used in any elections. The franchise was thus secured for most citizens, and voter registration and turnout climbed dramatically in southern states. Once again African Americans were able to participate fully in political life and began to win elective office at many levels.

In spite of its origins, today the term grandfather clause does not retain any pejorative sense.

Modern examples

Law

Standards compliance

Sports

NASCAR

In NASCAR, grandfather clause protection refers to sponsorship by Alltel, Cingular, Samsung, and RadioShack for a race at Texas Motor Speedway, in reference to a prohibition established on June 19, 2003 on NASCAR sponsorships in the Nextel Cup Series. No telecommunications company's advertising is permitted at NASCAR Nextel Cup Series events under the exclusivity agreement between NASCAR and Nextel. (Samsung was prohibited because they were a technical competitor to Nextel, which used exclusively Motorola products.) All parties had been regular sponsors in NASCAR's then-Winston Cup Series since 2002. They may continue with their present sponsorships but new sponsorships are prohibited.

After the 2005 merger of Sprint and Nextel, the prohibition on Samsung and RadioShack was removed, because Sprint carries Samsung products, and Sprint is sold at RadioShack. Nextel banned Motorola's primary sponsorship of Robby Gordon's #7, but Motorola can be used as an associate, so the Motorola logo could be seen on the door post of Gordon's car. The series was renamed the Sprint Cup Series in 2008, since Sprint is expected to phase-out the Nextel brand entirely by 2010.

The sponsorship issue came up after AT&T's acquisition of BellSouth in 2006. This gave AT&T 100% ownership of Cingular, and immediately announced the phaseout of the Cingular brand in favor of AT&T for wireless service. Sprint and NASCAR immediately prohibited AT&T from remaining as a sponsor for Jeff Burton, even though SBC (which bought its former parent company in 2005 and adopted the more-recognizable AT&T name as part of the deal) owned 60% of Cingular before the BellSouth deal. A compromise was later reached that allowed AT&T to remain as a sponsor through the 2008 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series while Richard Childress Racing has time to find a new sponsor for 2009.6 In June 2008, Caterpillar announced that it would leave the #22 Bill Davis Racing Toyota to sponsor the #31 starting in 2009.

The Alltel sponsorship will be phased out upon the closing of the deal by Verizon Wireless to acquire Alltel from TPG Capital Partners and other private equity firms in 2008. Verizon Wireless has a sponsorship deal in the NASCAR Nationwide Series with Gillett Evernham Motorsports that is not covered by the ban because it is in another series.

A similar rule is enforced in the NASCAR Nationwide Series in regards to insurance sponsorships. The two sponsors that had 2008 sponsorship contracts with Toyota teams Germain Racing and Joe Gibbs Racing – Geico and Farm Bureau Insurance, respectively – must leave the series after 2008.

See also

References

  1. ^ http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1B1-365960.html "Grandfather clause", Concise Encyclopedia Britannica
  2. ^ Glenn Feldman, The Disfranchisement Myth: Poor Whites and Suffrage Restriction in Alabama, Auburn: University of Georgia Press, 2004, p.136
  3. ^ Michigan State University College of Law
  4. ^ http://www.oilersheritage.com/history/dynasty_players_craigmactavish.html
  5. ^ http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20070415&content_id=1900688&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp
  6. ^ http://www.kentucky.com/529/story/170379.html