Global cities 

A global city (also called world city) is a city deemed to be an important node point in the global economic system. The concept comes from geography and urban studies and rests on the idea that globalization can be understood as largely created, facilitated and enacted in strategic geographic locales according to a hierarchy of importance to the operation of the global system of finance and trade. The most complex of these entities is the "global city," whereby the linkages binding a city have a direct and tangible effect on global affairs through socio-economic means.1 The terminology of "global city", as opposed to megacity, is thought to have been first coined by Saskia Sassen in reference to London, New York and Tokyo in her 1991 work The Global City,2 though the term "world city" to describe cities which control a disproportionate amount of global business dates to at least Patrick Geddes' use of the term in 1915. 3

Contents

Characteristics

Global City or world city status is seen as beneficial, and because of this many groups have tried to classify and rank which cities are seen as 'world cities' or 'non-world cities'. 3 Although there is a general consensus upon leading world cities, 4 the criteria upon which a classification is made can affect which other cities are included. 3 The criteria for identification tend either to be based on a "yardstick value" ("e.g. if the producer-service sector is the largest sector, then city X is a world city")3 or on an "imminent determination" ("if the producer-service sector of city X is greater than the producer-service sector of N other cities, then city X is a world city"). 3

The characteristics sometimes chosen include

2008 Global Cities Index

In October 2008, the journal Foreign Policy, in conjunction with consulting firm A. T. Kearney and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, published a ranking of global cities, based on consultation with Saskia Sassen, Witold Rybczynski, and others. Foreign Policy noted that "[t]he world’s biggest, most interconnected cities help set global agendas, weather transnational dangers, and serve as the hubs of global integration. They are the engines of growth for their countries and the gateways to the resources of their regions."5

The rankings are based on the evaluation of 24 metrics in five areas: business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experience, and political engagement. The top thirty of the 60 cities ranked were:

Rank City Country Best category (position in that category)
1 New York City  United States Business Activity and Human Capital (1st)
2 London  United Kingdom Cultural Experience (1st)
3 Paris  France Information Exchange (1st) Business activity (3rd)
4 Tokyo  Japan Business Activity (2nd)
5 Hong Kong  China Business Activity and Human Capital (5th)
6 Los Angeles  United States Human Capital (4th)
7 Singapore  Singapore Business Activity (6th)
8 Chicago  United States Human Capital (3rd)
9 Seoul  South Korea Information Exchange (5th)
10 Toronto  Canada Cultural Experience (4th)
11 Washington, D.C.  United States Political Engagement (1st)
12 Beijing  China Political Engagement (7th)
13 Brussels  Belgium Information Exchange (2nd)
14 Madrid  Spain Information Exchange (9th)
15 San Francisco  United States Human Capital (12th)
16 Sydney  Australia Human Capital (8th)
17 Berlin  Germany Cultural Experience (8th)
18 Vienna  Austria Political Engagement (9th)
19 Moscow  Russia Cultural Experience (6th)
20 Shanghai  China Business Activity (8th)
21 Frankfurt  Germany Business Activity (11th)
22 Bangkok  Thailand Political Engagement (13th)
23 Amsterdam  Netherlands Business Activity (10th)
24 Stockholm  Sweden Information Exchange (13th)
25 Mexico City  Mexico Cultural Experience (9th)
26 Zürich  Switzerland Information Exchange (8th)
27 Dubai  United Arab Emirates Information Exchange (14th)
28 Istanbul  Turkey Political Engagement (8th)
29 Boston  United States Human Capital (9th)
30 Rome  Italy Cultural Experience (15th)

GaWC global cities index

One attempt to define, categorize, and rank global cities was made in 1999 by the Globalization and World Cities Study Group and Network (GaWC) based at the geography department of Loughborough University. The roster was outlined in the GaWC Research Bulletin 5 and ranked cities based on their provision of "advanced producer services" such as accountancy, advertising, finance, and law.4 The GaWC inventory identifies three levels of global cities and several sub-ranks. This roster generally denotes cities in which there are offices of certain multinational corporations providing financial and consulting services rather than denoting other cultural, political, and economic centres.

An attempt to redefine and re-categorise leading global cities was made by the Globalization and World Cities Study Group and Network (GaWC) in 2004. This new roster acknowledged several new indicators but still retained a stark focus on economics rather than on political or cultural importance. The roster is reproduced below:

Global Cities6

Well rounded global cities
  1. Very large contribution: London and New York City
    Smaller contribution and with cultural bias: Los Angeles, Paris, and San Francisco
  2. Incipient global cities: Amsterdam, Boston, Chicago, Madrid, Milan, Moscow, Toronto
Global niche cities — specialised global contributions
  1. Financial: Hong Kong, Singapore and Tokyo
  2. Political and social: Brussels, Geneva and Washington, D.C.

World Cities

Subnet articulator cities
  1. Cultural: Berlin, Copenhagen, Melbourne, Munich, Oslo, Rome, Stockholm
  2. Political: Bangkok, Beijing, Vienna
  3. Social: Manila, Nairobi, Ottawa
Worldwide leading cities
  1. Primarily economic global contributions: Frankfurt, Miami, Munich, Osaka, Singapore, Sydney, Zurich
  2. Primarily non-economic global contributions: Abidjan, Addis Ababa, Atlanta, Basel, Barcelona, Cairo, Denver, Harare, Lyon, Manila, Mexico City, Mumbai, New Delhi, Shanghai

Other criteria

The GaWC list is based on specific criteria and, thus, may not include other cities of global significance or elsewhere on the spectrum. For example, cities with the following:

Selected criteria

Rank Population of city (proper) Population of metropolitan area Percentage foreign born30 Expatriate cost of living18 Metro systems by annual passenger ridership Top 10 rail systems by length Annual by passenger in a single airport 31 Number of billionaires (U.S. dollars)323334 Gross Metropolitan Product at PPPs (Total output; not per capita) 35
1 Mumbai Tokyo Dubai Moscow Tokyo London Atlanta Moscow Tokyo
2 Karachi Mexico City Kuwait City London Moscow New York City Chicago New York City New York City
3 Delhi Seoul Doha Seoul New York City Madrid London London Los Angeles
4 São Paulo New York City Manama Tokyo Seoul Moscow Tokyo Istanbul Chicago
5 Shanghai São Paulo Miami Hong Kong Mexico City Seoul Los Angeles Hong Kong Paris
6 Moscow Mumbai Toronto Copenhagen Paris Shanghai Paris Los Angeles London
7 Seoul Delhi Macau Geneva Hong Kong Paris Dallas Mumbai Greater Osaka Metropolitan Region
8 Istanbul Shanghai Muscat Osaka London Beijing Frankfurt San Francisco Mexico City
9 Mexico City Jakarta Hong Kong Zürich Osaka Tokyo Beijing Dallas Philadelphia
10 Tokyo Moscow Vancouver Oslo São Paulo Mexico City Denver Tokyo Washington, D.C.

See also

References

  1. ^ Sassen, Saskia - The global city: strategic site/new frontier
  2. ^ Sassen, Saskia - The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. (1991) - Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-07063-6
  3. ^ a b c d e Doel,M. & Hubbard, P., (2002), "Taking World Cities Literally: Marketing the City in a Global Space of flows",City, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 351-368. Subscription required
  4. ^ a b GaWC Research Bulletin 5, GaWC, Loughborough University, 28 July 1999
  5. ^ "The 2008 Global Cities Index". Foreign Policy (November/December 2008). October 21, 2008, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4509. Retrieved on 31 October 2008. 
  6. ^ Leading World Cities, GaWC, Loughborough University
  7. ^ Chapter 5: Globalization and cultural choicePDF (352 KB), "2004 Human Development Report" (page 99), UNDP, 2004
  8. ^ Chapter 9: Urban DataPDF (196 KB), "World Resources 1998-99", WRI, 1998
  9. ^ City Profiles, UN
  10. ^ Mobility 2001PDF (1.59 MB), WBCSD
  11. ^ WORLD URBANIZATION PROSPECTS: THE 2003 REVISIONPDF (3.73 MB), UN, 2004
  12. ^ Urban Characteristics,City Level, 1993PDF (61.6 KB), "World Resources 1998-99", WRI, 1998.
  13. ^ Global Urban Indicators Database 2 (1998 data) (data sets in .ZIP), UN-HABITAT
  14. ^ World Indices, Bloomberg
  15. ^ J.V. Beaverstock, World City Networks 'From Below', GaWC, Loughborough University, 29 September 2005
  16. ^ World-wide quality of living survey, Mercer, 10 April 2006
  17. ^ The city development indexPDF, "THE STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES REPORT 2001", UN-HABITAT, 21 June 2006
  18. ^ a b 2006 worldwide cost of living survey results released, Mercer, 26 June 2006
  19. ^ The World's Billionaires, Forbes, 2008
  20. ^ Mapping the Global Network Economy on the Basis of Air Passenger Transport Flows, GaWC, Loughborough University, 8 December 2004
  21. ^ Estimated Ridership of the World’s Largest Public Transit Systems, 1998
  22. ^ COMMUTER RAIL (SUBURBAN RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL) IN THE UNITED STATES: INTERNATIONAL CONTEXTPDF (218 KB), October 2003
  23. ^ Traffic Intensity by International Urban Area: 1990
  24. ^ Largest seaports of the world
  25. ^ The World's Best Skylines
  26. ^ [1]PDF (registration required)
  27. ^ K. O'Connor, International Students and Global Cities, GaWC, Loughborough University, 17 February 2005
  28. ^ World Heritage List, UNESCO
  29. ^ P. De Groote, Economic and Tourism Aspects of the Olympic Games, GaWC, Loughborough University, 21 September 2005
  30. ^ gstudy.com international statisticsPDF
  31. ^ http://www.aci.aero/aci/aci/file/Press%20Releases/2007_PRs/PR_180707_TOP10.pdf
  32. ^ INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGEMENTPDF (240 KB), International Financial Services, December 2004
  33. ^ Forbes reports billionaire boom, BBC, 10 March 2006
  34. ^ 500 richest in Russia, Finance Magazine, published by RBC. February 2006.
  35. ^ PriceWaterhouseCoopers, "UK Economic Outlook, March 2007", page 5. ""Table 1.2 – Top 30 urban agglomeration GDP rankings in 2005 and illustrative projections to 2020 (using UN definitions and population estimates)"" (PDF). Retrieved on 2007-03-09.

External links