![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
De facto corporation and corporation by estoppel |
| This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. (January 2008) |
| Companies law |
| Company · Business Sole proprietorship Corporation Cooperative |
| United States |
| S corporation · C corporation LLC · LLLP · Series LLC Delaware corporation Nevada corporation Massachusetts business trust |
| UK / Ireland / Commonwealth |
| Community interest company |
| European Union / EEA |
| SE · SCE · SPE · EEIG |
| Elsewhere |
| AB · AG · ANS · A/S · AS · GmbH K.K. · N.V. · OY · S.A. · more |
| Doctrines |
| Corporate governance Limited liability · Ultra vires Business judgment rule Internal affairs doctrine De facto corporation and
Piercing the corporate veilcorporation by estoppel Rochdale Principles |
| Related areas |
| Contract · Civil procedure |
De facto corporation and corporation by estoppel are both terms that are used by courts to describe circumstances in which a business organization that has failed to become a de jure corporation (a corporation by law) will nonetheless be treated as a corporation, thereby shielding shareholders from liability.
In order for a de facto corporation to be created, the following elements must exist:
If all of these requirements are met, then the business will be treated as a corporation for all purposes, except with respect to acts by state itself. However, most states will not apply this doctrine to protect a person who was aware that the incorporation effort was defective at the time that they purported to act on behalf of the corporation.
Corporation by estoppel, on the other hand, applies against someone who deals with a business as if it were a corporation, irrespective of whether there was a good faith effort by the business to incorporate. The person doing business with such an entity may later be estopped from arguing that it is not in fact a corporation, in an attempt to reach the assets of the incorporators. For the same reason, defendants who had acted as a corporation will be estopped from denying liability as a corporation when sued by a plaintiff who had relied on the defendant's corporate form when dealing with the defendant.
Unlike a de facto corporation, the theory of corporation by estoppel only applies to contract claimants, not tort claimants, because contract claimant should have known the nature of the entity with which they were doing business.